10
out of
12
people found the following review helpful:
No.
Overall Recommendation:
4
out of
5
people found the following review helpful:
Story structure is lacking.
Overall Recommendation:
2
out of
3
people found the following review helpful:
Some genuine talent on display
Overall Recommendation:
2
out of
3
people found the following review helpful:
Love the energy
Overall Recommendation:
1
out of
2
people found the following review helpful:
It has flair, but lacks originality...
Overall Recommendation:
columbus
January 14, 2011
1
out of
3
people found the following review helpful:
i dont get this
Overall Recommendation:
Chicago
November 20, 2010
1
out of
3
people found the following review helpful:
Electric Sunset Definite Top Choice for Winner!
Overall Recommendation:
Valdosta
November 18, 2010
1
out of
3
people found the following review helpful:
Good
Overall Recommendation:
California
November 18, 2010
0
out of
1
people found the following review helpful:
Descriptive and Fun, but there are problems.
Overall Recommendation:
Winter Garden
December 29, 2010
0
out of
1
people found the following review helpful:
Script needs work to live up to promise of premise
Overall Recommendation:
La Honda
December 22, 2010
Electric Sunset,
Kris's 2nd Draft (Script 2)
11/17/2010
Author's logline: "A burnt out international spy returns to his hometown and finds it overrun with human trafficking and prostitution."
Summary: A man we don't know is killed in the first scene, and this tale is told in flashback a la Sunset Boulevard. It turns out he's a cartoon caricature of white boy fantasies about being a tough guy lady's man.
Recommend script: no
Entertainment Value: 1.5 out of 5 stars
REVIEW:
The Plot:
The very first scene calls for an "aerial shot," which may indicate the writer intends this to be a large budget production from square one.
The lead character "Nick" is introduced memorably, although I don't know the song referenced, or if it may need rights cleared.
Oddly the writer has introduced "Bodyguard #2" although no "Bodyguard #1" has materialized first. Similarly, the label "Cowboy" is substituted for a named character, "Jackson", leading to confusion and a loss of some confidence.
The band AC "fucking" DC may have some say about their participation in this project, as stands. The author comes off as a newbie, with little experience in the realities of spec features. This flashback supposedly provides the birth story of Nick the main character, but adds very little to the plot.
The fourth wall is demolished finally, with dialogue such as: "she's like ten, come on. Just forget I said that. Thought that. Fuck, now you think I'm an asshole."
Somewhat prescient.
The beginning lacks story focus. This is clearly evident with events such as:
"Student #3 turns to the crowd and puts his hands up in the air victorious."
We should care about this kid's game why? "Student #3" passes for a credible villain?
Later that day: "For some reason, I was always getting yelled at."
This over him being yelled at by his father. It's not adding, it's redundant.
Then suddenly Nick is in his twenties in the Ukraine, and he's in the middle of the Bourne Redundancy. One can't help but notice that most of what preceded did NOT lead up to this, and was seemingly irrelevant.
Lines like this, however, are designed to have us forget all that:
"Fat Man takes off his jacket getting ready to fight.
NICK (CONT'D)
What, you're gonna sit on me?"
Yes, it's that kind of film. Nick does blatantly unlikely things, because we must assume he's such a badass that the laws of physics and common sense do not apply. Again, lines like this should distract us from the unlikely gun snatchings and escacpes:
"LAURA DIAZ, a curvy Spanish woman wearing a neon thong walks between them. Bill stares shamelessly.
NICK
Seriously? It's a wonder Bin Laden's still alive."
Here we learn that Nick has been shot, but is far too macho to have even noticed:
"Despite all the blood he shows no sign of pain."
The writer has most likely never been shot.
Nick, the desire of all Ukrainian prostitutes, is far too unbelievable and arrogant to be taken seriously on any level. Perhaps that will pass with an immature audience.
"KATE SCOTT, now in her 20's and as beautiful as ever..." brings us up to date with little Kate, except there's no way for the movie audience to know this actress is supposed to be the same character.
Then Nick is elsewhere, and the reasons are unclear. He's in a barfight with lots of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
On page 35 (of 128) we finally run into the Cowboy character who supposedly kills Nick, the main character in scene one. As arbitrary as that initial scene is the circumstance of this meeting. This script has thus far lacked any discernible plan by the antagonist, nor much clarity to the protagonist's actions. It has rambled across the world, across ages, and with gratuitous sex and violence.
The story seems to begin here at a US brothel where the Cowboy Jackson is one of the hired help muscle who make sure big strong heroes like Nick don't walk off with the Ukrainian girls. This doesn't seem to jibe with Nick's earlier womanizing character, unless I missed some previous chivalrous rescuing. This is glaringly inconsistent, and the script would be better if pages 1-34 were simply deleted. It would also improve if this scene particularly was taken seriously, given some gravitas, and not treated like a series of inconsequential one-liners and posturing for the camera. It's hard to take anything in this script seriously, and if so -- what's the point?
So now, at first sight, the heroic Nick has adopted prostitute Alexsandra. Why? I don't know. They get away (rolls eyes at how).
Nick explains in a nutshell his version of the white slave trade. This is awkward and ill timed. Perhaps an opening sequence to the film would be more appropriate. Also, with no prior motivation shown, Nick's actions at the brothel don't make a lick of sense. What is it exactly that makes him turn into anti-prostitution man?
As the script is still only 1/3 of the way through, I have the feeling the author may get to some of these logical steps eventually. Will I still be reading, though?
Then Nick has just happened to drive his truck into a lake in exactly the right spot to ifnd an underwater graveyard of beautiful dead prostitutes. The mind boggles at the probability.
In good conscience, to myself, I refuse to continue.
Characters:
The characters, even Aleksandra, are so unreal that one feels as if it's a spoof parody along the lines of Airplane, but not funny. These people are not modeled on real living people, but on movie cliches that don't really think and breathe on their own.
Thoughts
This adolescent male fantasy nonsense is reminiscent of cheesy 80's sex comedies mixed with a ridiculous spy tie-in. Purely exploitative, and without much other purpose. Women are treated primarily as sex objects, and many females will likely find this offensive.
Dialogue:
Much of it at the start is exposition, and some of the scenes are superfluous. The short nature of the scenes almost distracts from the reality that they are unnecessary and not telling the main story -- who is the main antagonist here?
Lines like these make me wish I had chosen a different script:
"KATE
Look who decided to be my knight in shining armor."