More About Me
I've been screenwriting seriously for about 10 years. Even though I was told I would never land an agent without moving to California (I'm landlocked in Missouri), I believed that my writing would speak for itself and that an agent wouldn't care where I lived as long as my work was solid. In the end, I was right! I landed professional representation in Los Angeles (more than once, in fact), and my writing has been read and praised by industry professionals.
So I'm betting you are probably wondering why I'm going this route if I have Hollywood reps, right? It's simple-- I just got a little tired of constantly revising my work for one person (my manager) before others could see it and weigh in on it, which is why Amazon Studios seems pretty much perfect for me.
Two years ago, my sample work was deemed solid enough for me to be given my first assignment. I was so excited to be writing an actual assignment... until the project was cancelled 2 days after I started my work (and they hadn't even read how cool my stuff was yet)! Bummer, huh? The experience left me just a bit burned out, and though I still desperately want to write (and believe my scripts are pretty fun), I decided I wanted to try a different route. I was toying with the idea of writing children's novels when I recently discovered Amazon Studios, which I think may officially be the coolest thing ever conceived of (with the exception of 5 dollar foot-longs at Subway).
Now I plan on uploading my work here, letting you and the good folks at Amazon take a look at what I have to offer. I'm pumped about the idea of putting whatever I want out there for people to see. There's something invigorating about sharing my work in the pure form in which it was originally envisioned. I'm excited to see what happens!
I was very impressed by the story structure and the pacing. There wasn't a single wasted scene. In general, things flowed very well.
I liked the tone as well. The beginning had a "Super 8" feel to it (at least it did to me).
A few concerns:
(But I think these are very fixable)
1. Maybe I missed something, but I felt like there was too big of a jump from the missing treasure to the Devil's Bog. One minute they are discussing the Celtic treasure, and the next minute, they are sure it's at the bog. Why? Yes, mysterious things happen there, but there's never been any indication that it might be the site of a treasure. I just felt like that was too big of a leap. I know you're wanting to get into the story quickly, but I think there should be more of a connection. Since Ally is an aspiring journalist, maybe she uncovers something about the bog that lets her make the connection. Whatever the case might be, I think there needs to be some tip off to the kids that the treasure could be there. Otherwise, they're just assuming too much.
2. Merritt sometimes comes off as too smart. He's just a kid, and I think we need to be reminded of that from time to time. Otherwise, he just comes off as an adult in a kid's body. I think a lot of that comes from his dialogue. Maybe that was what you were shooting for, but see my notes about National Treasure and the Goonies below.
3. I'm a little worried that there's no real contact between the kids and the villain until late in the story. Have you ever read Something Wicked This Way Comes by Ray Bradbury? Your story reminded me of that a bit. Yes, I realize they are two different stories, but the idea of the kids battling dark forces seems to fit with your story. In Something Wicked, Jim and Will meet Mr. Dark early on, and then a cat and mouse game ensues. I think you could play with that idea a bit.
All that said, I think the story rocks. Some of the action set pieces would be amazing. I want to see the bog on the big screen!
Below are the notes I took while reading. Some are just basic typo stuff, and some represent bigger issues.
PAGE BY PAGE NOTES:
p 1: Minor punctuation issue. You use a hyphen between “intensity” and “frogs.” It’s not a hyphenated word. I think you were going for a dash (2 hyphens), or you could use a colon. Not a biggie. I still understood that it was for emphasis.
p 3: One thing I really like is that your aren’t wasting a ton of lines on character descriptions. I’ve seen that a lot from scripts here at Amazon, but you're keeping it tight and to the point. Well done.
p 4: You have several description lines that look like this:
TEAL
closes the book.
I think this is fine if you are really trying to emphasize something, but in most cases, I think you could simply save yourself some page space and go with “Teal closes the book.”
p 5: Watch out for “tells” vs. “shows.” You described Eddie as a brat in an action line. Not necessary. His actions that immediately follow are all I need to know that he’s a jerk.
p 6: Maybe overusing caps just a bit much? It’s not a hard, fast rule. Just more of a style thing. I guess it’s up to you, but I think others might think it’s too much.
(And despite any nitpicks I’ve mentioned thus far, I’m already really enjoying this!)
p 8: The slugline “EXT. BICYCLES-AT SHADY CLEARING – DAY is a little odd to me. Maybe just go with EXT. SHADY CLEARING – DAY and then describe what the bicycles are doing immediately underneath?
p 12: Quick observation: you’ve got an action chunk at the bottom of 12 that is 6 lines long. I’ve been told by more than one agent that you should try to limit the chunks to 4 lines. Maybe you could start a new chunk with “He looks up from his window…”
p 17: I have a bit of a hard time believing the kids have a remote-controlled gas canister rig. Seems a bit high tech. Don’t get me wrong—I love the revenge moment, but maybe you need to come up with another way to dispense the mustard? If we had some inclination that one of them was a gadget expert earlier on (Data from The Goonies), then this would fit fine. Otherwise, I would try to simplify the prank.
p. 19: I’m a little confused. Does Ally mention the Devil’s Bog because she thinks there’s a connection to the treasure, or is she just mentioning it since Merritt says there’s nothing interesting going on in Oakwood? If she thinks there’s a treasure connection… that’s a pretty big leap. What have we seen so far that would indicate a connection? It’s a mysterious place, but I don’t think there’s any evidence it could be the site of the treasure. At this point, maybe I’m way off anyway, but if that’s where you are headed, you might need to give us a few more hints about the bog to make it believable that she would instantly think to go there.
p. 22: Would a fleet of trucks, even really BIG trucks, really cause a tremor all around town? That said, the arrival of the trucks is a neat moment.
p 27: “Theresa, getting the hint, She finishes her…” should just be “Theresa, getting the hint, finishes her…”
p 31: The water moccasin scene actually made me cringe. That’s a good moment—very creepy. You can almost imagine an entire audience gasping when they hear the HISSS.
p 32: This ties back to a previous comment. At page 32, what exactly are they exploring the bog for? Just because it’s creepy, or do they think it has something to do with the treasure? I feel like that connection still hasn’t been made. Maybe it’s coming.
p 33: Finding the drawbridge by chance doesn’t fit the spirit of a treasure hunting flick. I feel like there should be a clue, or something to showcase our heroes’ talents. The fact that Danny just happened to throw a knife into the exact spot seems like an easy way out. At the very least, maybe their brush with the moccasin could uncover something. At least that flows a little better. Maybe even killing the moccasin is what opens the gate? Like it's some symbolic act of bravery, so they are allowed in?
p 36: Merritt’s explanation of Celtic architecture. It can be hard to sell the dialogue in a story like this, because when we want kids to be our heroes, they sometimes have to take on some adult challenges. I think the explanation Merritt gives is good, but is there a way to “kidify” the language a bit? I’m not saying dumb him down, but maybe inject a couple of kidisms into this passage and others like it. Maybe a good place to insert the occasional bit of humor to break up the longer exposition. It seems like when Merritt is giving a speech like this, Danny could chime in from time to time. Think of the film National Treasure. Ben always broke into these wordy explanations of things that happened in history, and while they were essential to the plot, they did get a little dry. But Riley (who I realize some people found annoying) always interjected with something to break those big chunks up, mainly because in real life, people just don’t speak that way. I’m not saying that Danny has to assume the role of amusing sidekick, but it might be nice to use him this way from time to time.
p. 37: Same thing, this time with the translation. I get that Merritt is a smart kid (and I like his character, so don’t fool with him too much), but think of The Goonies. In that film, Mouth was the translator, and even though he was pretty good with Spanish, there were a couple of moments in which he stumbled while translating. When Merritt reads the translation perfectly, he loses his “kid charm.” It might be nice to see him have to work a little harder to make sense of it. Could be a good place to work in a little more humor.
p. 42: Here comes a more serious comment: we’re at page 42 now, nearing the middle of the script, and while we’ve seen brief glimpses of Bocanegra, there doesn’t seem to be an established villain yet. I know the main conflict is the kids overcoming the obstacles to reach the treasure (at least it seems that way at this point), but remember, the Goonies were hunting treasure, but they also had to deal with the Fratellis, and they were established as the baddies in the opening scene. Having a bad guy to compete with gives the story a ticking clock.
p. 46: I’m really enjoying the action. The script has a nice pace.
p. 53: Double cont’d on Delilah’s dialogue at the bottom of the page
p. 56: Can an oak root really be 50 feet in diameter?
p 57: I don’t know if chickening out is in Ally’s character. She’s the young reporter. She’s the go-getter. She’s the Lois Lane of the trio, right? Would she really back off, or would she go after the scoop?
p. 62: I’m not sure how I feel about Merritt cutting himself and using his blood. Don’t get me wrong—it’s cool, but as a parent, I’m wondering if this is now a little dark for a kid’s adventure flick. I get that it’s important, but I’m not sure if it matches the tone of the story.
p. 65: I get that Romancer Diversified Products are the baddies, but we’re halfway through the script and there’s been no interaction between them and the main character. I think that’s a problem.
p. 66: Format issue—bottom of 65 and top of 66 are in bold for some reason.
p. 70: It’s the 3rd straight day that Merritt has been gone. Wouldn’t an adult somewhere express concern?
p. 71: I get that kids are getting sick from the chemicals, but at page 71, it might be a little late to introduce this threat to the story.
p. 71: I like the moment with the lighter. I think your script would benefit from a few more upbeat moments like this.
p. 91: It seems to me that a mystical tree might need more than herbicide to kill it. Might the concoction being poured into the root system be some sort of dark magic potion? How could you play with that idea? Instead of kids just getting sick, what might happen? What kind of chaos might be unleashed around the town?
p. 97: I really like this moment. Cool payoff to the animal scene earlier.
100-118: All in all, I really like the end. The pacing is great, the build-up is solid, and everything pays off. Well done.
Thanks for the opportunity to read this Luke. I have no doubt that you are on the right track with this script, and a couple of tweaks can make it 5 stars all the way! Good luck!